1000 words:

1. Bob goes into Sam’s bookshop and sees a book which he wants to buy on display. He takes the book to the counter to pay for it, but Sam tells him that the copy of the book is his only copy and that he has already sold it to Carl, but forgot to remove it from the display. Is Sam entitled to refuse to sell Bob the book? Taking this scenario in to  consideration explain the importance of the essential elements required for the formation of a valid contract. Discuss the impact of different types of contract and analyse terms in contracts with reference to their meaning and effect.
2. Barry goes into a park which is managed by his local council. He sees a notice which states that chairs are for hire for 50p per hour. Barry pays the 50p and is given a ticket and a chair. Later, the chair collapses under him, damaging his clothes. When Barry complains, the attendant points to a clause on the ticket which states. “No liability is accepted for any damage or injury caused by the failure of any hired equipment.” Are the council entitled to rely on the clause? Taking this scenario in to consideration, apply the elements of contract in given business scenarios, apply the law terms in different contracts and evaluate the effect of different terms in given contracts.
3. Click here for more on this paper…….
   Click here to have a similar A+ quality paper done for you by one of our writers within the set deadline at a discounted
4. Adam advertises a reward of 1000 pound for the first person to paddle across the English channel in a bath from Dover to Calais. Brian sees the advertisement in the newspaper, purchases a bath, and sets out from Dover. On the same day, whilst Brian is in mid-channel, Adam places another advertisement in the same newspaper announcing that the reward is duly arrives in Calais. Brian then claims the reward. Adam refuses to pay. Is Brian entitled to claim the reward? Taking this scenario in to consideration, contrast liability in tort with contractual liability, explain the nature of liability in negligence and explain how a business can be vicariously liable.

1000 words:

One night, Mark decides to check I at the Poshplace Hotel, which is owned by Ben. Later that night, Mark is in his room when a masked man enters and threatens to hurt him unless he hands over his valuable antique jewellery. Mark hands it over. The thief later turns out to be Neil, the hotel gardener, who had stolen a master key to the hotel room.

Meantime, downstairs in the kitchen, Roger, the dishwasher, is complaining about the skin rash he has developed as a result of long periods of washing up. Although rubber gloves are available, most employees do not use them. Colin, the head chef, is getting fed up with Roger and in his anger, knocks Roger unconscious with a frying pan.

Meanwhile, to cheer himself up, Mark later decides to go to the Hotel pool for a swim. A sign on the pool door reads: “Pool closed between 7.00p.m. and 7.00am”. No entry to visitors during these hours: “dangerous and unattended”. Mark reads but ignores the sing and enters. He cannot find the light so just jumps in. in fact, the pool has been emptied and Mark is badly injured and tears his expensive designer swimming trunks.

Task: Evaluate the accuracy of each of the seven statements A, B,C ,D ,E ,F and  G individually as they apply to they apply to the facts in the above scenario.  Apply the elements of the tort of negligence and defences and Apply the elements of vicarious liability in this situations.

Statement A: Neil does not owe Roger a non-delegable duty of care as an employer to provide a safe working environment.

Statement B: Roger can bring a claim in vicarious liability against Neil for Colin’s actions.

Statement C: The Poshplace Hotel is liable to Mark under the Occupiers Liability Act 1957.

Statement D: The Poshplace Hotel is not liable to Mark under the Occupiers Liability Act 1984 because of its warning notice.

Statement E: Mark can use ordinary negligence principles in his  claim against Poshplace.

Statement F: Under the Occupiers liability Act, Mark will not be able to claim for the cost of his designer swimming trunks.

Statement G: Mark can bring a claim in vicarious liability against Poshplace Hotel for the loss of his jewellery.