order Now

Pros and Cons of Mandatory Continuing Nursing Education

1. create a PowerPoint presentation of 6 slides, 3 slides for each in which you compare the pros and cons of continuing nursing education related to the following:

 

  1. Impact on knowledge and attitudes.
  2. Relationship to professional certification.

Should continuing nursing education be mandatory for all nurses? Support your position with rationale.

A minimum of three scholarly souces are required for this assignment.

While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment.

 

 

2) As you have discovered through this course, nurses are influential members of the community and the political system. Therefore, for the purposes of this assignment you will identify a problem or concern in your community, organization, etc. that has the capacity to be legislated. You will conduct research and state a proposal. Through the legislative process, your proposal for the problem or concern may influence an idea for change into a law.

First, refer to the “How a Bill Becomes a Law” media.

http://lc.gcumedia.com/zwebassets/courseMaterialPages/nrs440v_how-a-bill-becomes-a-law-v2.1.php

Then, view the “Bill to Law Process” to watch the scenario.

After viewing the scenario, refer to the “Legislative Assignment.” You will need to save the document first in order to use it.

Submit the assignment to the instructor. You also reserve the right to submit your completed proposal to the respective government official. However, this is optional. If you select to submit your proposal as a part of the legislative process, refer to “Find Your Representative” or research the contact information on your own.

APA format is not required, but solid academic writing is expected.

You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin, unless otherwise directed by your instructor. If so directed, refer to the Student Success Center for directions. Only Word documents can be submitted to Turnitin.

 

Attachments:

Top of Form

Collaborative Learning Community: Pros and Cons of Mandatory Continuing Nursing Education

1
Unsatisfactory
0.00%

2
Less than Satisfactory
75.00%

3
Satisfactory
79.00%

4
Good
89.00%

5
Excellent
100.00%

80.0 %Content
25.0 %Compare the pros and cons of continuing nursing education related to the impact on knowledge and attitudes, and use the comparison to support group opinion of mandatory continuing nursing education. Fails to effectively compare pros and cons of continuing nursing education related to the impact on knowledge and attitudes. Group’s position is vague and poorly supported in the presentation. Compares a pro and con of continuing nursing education related to the impact on knowledge and attitudes. Group’s position is vague, but draws support from more generalized examples from the pro-con comparison. Compares a few of the pros and cons of continuing nursing education related to the impact on knowledge and attitudes. Group’s position is clearly presented, and draws support from more generalized examples from the pro-con comparison. Thoughtfully compares many of the pros and cons of continuing nursing education related to the impact on knowledge and attitudes, and supports comparisons with logical reasoning and/or research. Clearly presents group’s position on continuing nursing education, and draws support from specific examples from the pro/con comparison. Thoughtfully compares most of the pros and cons of continuing nursing education related to the impact on knowledge and attitudes, and supports comparisons with logical reasoning and research. Clearly and persuasively presents group’s position on continuing nursing education, and draws support from specific examples from the pro/con comparison.
25.0 %Compare the pros and cons of continuing nursing education, as it relates to professional certification, and use the comparison to support group opinion of mandatory continuing nursing education. Fails to effectively compare pros and cons of continuing nursing education as it relates to professional certification. Group’s position is vague and poorly supported in the presentation. Compares a pro and con of continuing nursing education as it relates to professional certification. Group’s position is vague, but draws support from more generalized examples from the pro-con comparison. Compares a few of the pros and cons of continuing nursing education as it relates to professional certification. Group’s position is clearly presented, and draws support from more-generalized examples from the pro-con comparison. Thoughtfully compares many of the pros and cons of continuing nursing education as it relates to professional certification, and supports comparisons with logical reasoning and/or research. Clearly presents group’s position on continuing nursing education, and draws support from specific examples from the pro/con comparison. Thoughtfully compares most of the pros and cons of continuing nursing as it relates to professional certification, and supports comparisons with logical reasoning and research. Clearly and persuasively presents group’s position on continuing nursing education, and draws support from specific examples from the pro/con comparison.
   

       
10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, over use of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point.

The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

10.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
5.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
5.0 %Evaluating and Documenting Sources(in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly cited references within the body of the presentation. Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with many errors. Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with some errors. Title slide is complete.

References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.

Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.

100 %Total Weightage

 

Bottom of Form

 

How a Bill Becomes a Law – Scenario

Introduction (Setting the Stage)

You are working in the emergency room of a local hospital. Two children are rushed in with multiple

injuries including broken bones and lacerations to the head. You learn that the children were riding on

the front row of a school bus when a car made an illegal turn in front of the bus causing the bus driver to

brake suddenly.

You decide to research similar incidents and notice this is a common occurrence both in the state and

nationally. You are also aware of a legislative bill in your state last year to have seatbelts placed on all

school buses, but it did not pass; in fact, the bill never progressed past the House Transportation

Committee which meant that the bill “died in committee.”

Here is an example of the path a bill has to take to become a law in the state of Indiana.

The process is

very similar in other states. Notice how easy it is for a bill to die along the way.

http://www.in.gov/core/files/BillintoLaw.pdf

Your Idea:

As a constituent of your state and a concerned health care provider, you find yourself troubled that such

an important bill focused on child safety would not even pass through its first committee.

You decide

that if the recommendations to the bill were changed to require seatbelts for those only sitting in the

front seats of the bus, the bill might have a better chance of passing. So you discuss the idea with

several colleagues and they agree that it would be worth perusing. You do not know how to move this

initiative forward so you start exploring.

You find out that the idea for a bill can begin with a legislator

(elected government official), state agency, business, lobbyist, state-nursingassociation, or a citizen like

you! You find out that Mr. Thomas Jones is your representative to the state legislature, and you realize

that he is a parent in your school district.

Putting Your Plan Into Action:

Mr. Jones has been very active in the community. He has three young children who ride the school bus.

You see him at a PTAmeeting and decide to mention your idea to him. Mr. Jones tells you he is

interested in your idea but needs to know more information; how many people feel the same way and

how much background information can you give him. He informs you that he will consider supporting

the idea if you obtain 1,500 names on a petition from the district and fill out his legislative worksheet for

new ideas. You get your friends to canvas the neighborhood where the incident occurred. Within days,

you have more than 2,000 signatures of registered voters who support this initiative.

You visit Mr. Jones in his office in the State Capitol and present him with the signatures and the

completed legislative worksheet. He discusses this initiative with his colleagues in the house and gets

three representatives to agree to sponsor the bill with him.

They introduce the bill and it starts its

journey through the legislative process. The members of the committee discuss the merits of the bill and

then vote on it. If approved, the bill goes to the full House. They will examine the merits of the bill,

debate as needed, and vote. If the House doesnot approve the bill, it may either send it back to the

committee it came from or abandon it. If more than half of members approve it, the bill is sent to the

other house (in this case, the Senate).

In the Senate, the process is repeated. If passed, it then goes to the governor to sign into law. The

governor reserves the right to veto the bill and send it back to Congress. Both houses of Congress then

have three choices:

1. They can change the bill so it is more to the governor’s liking; or

2. They can agree that the bill will never be passed and let it go; or

3. They can vote to override the governor’s veto.

In order for Congress to override the governor’s signature, they need to have two-thirds of the members

of both houses vote to override.

Good news for you: The Senate passed your bill, and the governor has signed it. Your bill is now a law

We are always aiming to provide top quality academic writing services that will surely enable you achieve your desired academic grades. Our support is round the clock!

[order_calculator]