order Now

Response paper

There is a movement in psychology to require the usage of psychological measures to aid in the diagnosis of some mental illnesses. While developing the DSM-V, there was some discussion of including results of specific measures as part of diagnostic criteria. Considering the two articles you read, Limitations of Diagnostic Precision and Predictive Utility in the Individual Case: A Challenge for Forensic Practiceand Diagnostic Utility of the NAB List Learning Test in Alzheimer’s Disease and Amnestic Mild Cognitive Impairment,write a response paper discussing the utility of using psychological measures as suggested above in the diagnosis of mental illness.

 

BE SURE TO INCLUDE A REFERENCE PAGE, IN TEXT CITATIONS, APA FORMAT

 

 

Requirements of submission:  Response Paper assignments must follow these formatting guidelines: double spacing, 12-point Times New Roman font, one-inch margins, and discipline-appropriate citations. Page length requirements: 1–2 pages.

 

 

 

Instructor Feedback: Students can find their feedback in the grade book as an attachment.

 

 

 

Critical Elements

Distinguished

Proficient

Emerging

Not Evident

Value

Main Elements

Includes all of the main elements and requirements and elaborates on these elements

(27-30)

Includes most of the main elements and requirements and includes some elaboration

(24-26)

Includes some of the main elements and requirements

 

(21-23)

Does not include any of the main elements and requirements

(0-20)

30

Inquiry and Analysis

 

Provides an in-depth response and analysis of thoughts

(23-25)

Provides an in-depth response with some analysis of thoughts

(20-22)

Provides some response and little analysis of thoughts

(18-19)

Provides minimal response with no analysis of thoughts

(0-17)

25

Integration and Application

All  of the course concepts are correctly applied

(9-10)

Most of the course concepts are correctly applied

(8)

Some of the course concepts are correctly applied

(7)

Does not correctly apply any of the course concepts

(0-6)

10

Critical Thinking

Draws insightful conclusions that are thoroughly defended with evidence and examples

(23-25)

Draws informed conclusions that are justified with evidence

 

(20-22)

Draws logical conclusions, but does not defend with evidence

 

(18-19)

Does not draw logical conclusions

 

(0-17)

25

Writing

(Mechanics/Citations)

No errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations

(9-10)

Minor errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations

(8)

Some errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations

(7)

Major errors related to organization, grammar and style, and citations 

(0-6)

10

Earned Total

Comments: 

100%

 

 

 

We are always aiming to provide top quality academic writing services that will surely enable you achieve your desired academic grades. Our support is round the clock!

[order_calculator]

Response paper

Response paper

it’s an art history paper based on the following readings from the book "`the art of art history" by donald preziosi:

-Heidegger, "the origins of the work of art"

-Schapiro, "the still lifr as personal object"

-Jacques Derrida, Restitutions of the truth in pointing"

the paper is not a summary of the readings and no additional information is needed. no additional research

We are always aiming to provide top quality academic writing services that will surely enable you achieve your desired academic grades. Our support is round the clock!

[order_calculator]